Artificial Intelligence, Is it really the best creation we’ve ever created?

Artificial Intelligence is considered one of the best creation we’ve ever created. It’s now everywhere in our daily lives. AI develops really fast, faster than you could imagine. Even though it makes our life easier but now let’s talk about its disadvantages.

In 10 years, there might be flying cars or transportation at a very high speed, no one knows. Have you ever heard of non-pilotted airplane? It’s a cool thing and it shows the development of AI. No more human error because the airplane is taken over by a robot. But if you think carefully, what about the pilots? The answer is they just lost their job. Pilots did absolutely nothing wrong but they just got fired because of a robot. Not just pilots but also other occupations that humans are being replaced because of AI. In the future, robots will do human’s job, it possibly do it better than us. Why would we let the robots do our job. Instead I think if we use it wisely, we could use it to help us do our work easier. If not, then soon it will be our boss.

Right now, there are smartphones, tablets and other kinds of technology that is programmed by AI. Many people owns it and it’s really convenient to our lives. However, there are some disadvantages about them. If you look at your daily life, think about what you do since you’ve woken up. Is it checking your phone? Tatsuo Tabata, a professor from Osaka University said that AI made humans too dependent, which made humans lost their mental capacitites. I agree with him because it really destroys mental capacities. I can give you an obvious example. When I was in grade 3, before students went home they will get their notebooks out to write what homeworks they have. But nowadays, they have their reminders on their phones/tablets. There was one of my friend who use the reminder to remind him about his homeworks. One day his tablet is broken, he couldn’t remember any of his homework because he always uses the reminder. So he doesn’t need to remember anything at all, but this situation taught him that he mustn’t be too dependent on AI.

Nowadays there are many robots in different places like hospital or mall. They are there just to greet customers. But it’s a good example of how AI works. It can only do what it was programmed to do. For example, if it’s programmed just to say hi, it just says hi. It couldn’t say “how are you” because it’s not programmed to say. They can’t work outside of what they were programmed for. It also costs a lot of money because right now we only have a few experienced AI programmers. So I think it would be better if we try to use less AI and use more humans because robots aren’t humans, they don’t have emotions like us.

To summarize this, we should try to use less AI because if we still use them more and more often, it could lead to disasters. Humanity would be taken, people lost their job. These are things that are happening right and it’s in our hands to stop it.

Should Censorship on Twitter Be Applied?

Twitter is an online social networking platform that enables people to express anything they want on it. A number of people use Twitter to stay up-to-date with current affairs, not only to catch up with the latest news but also to exchange opinions with each other on specific topics. Although Twitter fully supports freedom of expression of users, governments and other authorities are required to take action on blocking the access, also called censorship, to some unfortunate contents that might cause harms the users. I completely support censorship on Twitter due to some possible negative consequences.

First, children are at risk to be exposed to some inappropriate contents on Twitter like pornography, sexual violence, rude word use and gambling due to its opened source. Additionally, children are more likely to imitate those improper acts if they are not restricted to access to those improper contents. The censorship on Twitter is, therefore, necessary to be applied on social media, not only on Twitter but also other kinds of it in order to prevent children’s imitation.

Second, Twitter can easily contribute to cyber-bullying because Twitter regards itself as the “free speech wing of the free speech party” that means it is so free to tweet anything on Twitter even though it is bad for other people. Twitter clients may encounter different types of harassment including stalking, insults and sexual harassment. Moreover, Twitter has become where maltreatment and harassment are most frequently found since this freedom makes people bully other people simply. Accordingly, there should be censorship on such harsh contents to avoid social bullying.

Last but not least, the censorship on Twitter can assist a country to protect social stability and national safety. To explain, some people who might have bad intention of destroying a country can tweet anything, including releasing false information or distorting facts, which might cause damage to that national economy and stability. Applying the censorship, thus, is beneficial to a county which it can filter and block unpleasant and illegal activities and crimes.

In conclusion, I think Censorship on Twitter should be applied. despite the fact that Twitter is a platform that provides people with freedom and privacy, it is not always good because it can lead to negative results. Consequently, censorship for some contents is recommended for the government or other related authorities to apply it on Twitter to prevent likely negative consequences. The censorship can help children protect from unsuitable contents, reduce social media bullying, and protect the economies interest.

INTERNET CENSORSHIP

Nowadays, Internet is very important for our life.There are many people using the internet in many ways. Some people use it for selling things, so they can earn money from the internet. Some people use it for connecting people, so they can connect the others every time that they want. Even if they aren’t stay together or long distance. Some people use internet for learning or playing game. These people get many advantages from the internet. But when we use the internet, not only the advantages that we get from the internet but there also many disadvantages that we get from the internet. The persons who sell things on the internet. They must pay advertising fees when they post on the internet. The persons who use the internet for connecting people. They must give their personal information to the application that they use for connecting people. The persons who use internet for learning or playing game They pay money for the items in their games if the want to win in the games or they pay money for lesson that they want to learn but it’s not free. Using internet gets both advantages and disadvantages. For this reason, “Internet censorship” is the important thing to reduce the disadvantages of the internet. Everybody will get only advantages when they use the internet and get at least the disadvantages. Internet censorship is used as the tools for control or restriction of contents that people can approach or see on the internet. Internet censorship differs in each country. Each country hasdifferent rules to control and show transparency of their management about internet censorship. In my opinion, internet censorship has both advantages and disadvantages. It protects people who access the internet from bad and violence information and it also protect me because I am one of the people who access internet every day.

Content blocking is one of the advantages of internet censorship. It is software that is launched for limit or prevention of accessing websites which is called “WEB FILTERS” or “CENSORWARE”. It immediately blocks contents which is violent or dangerous for the persons who use the internet especially children. For example, the videos of intentionally killing by cutting off the head of a person which show on the internet like YouTube and Twitter in a few years ago. If the children access to these videos, they will be scary. Moreover, parents can use internet censorship to control their children by using software that is designed especially for parents. Parents can prevent their children from accessing inappropriate contents on the Internet such as some links of websites that are not appropriate for children. Furthermore, governments use internet censorship to control people who use the internet in their countries. To control about contents that cannot show on the internet, for example, some contents can trigger conflicts in the country during the election. Some important military information which if not protected can put the country’s security and its population at possible risks. A study on Internet censorship in Thailand shows the blocking websites about the threats to national security which are almost 74,686 of URLs have been blocked since 2007.


The disadvantage of internet censorship that we can see obviously is a limit on a person’s need to seethe contents they want to see or the contents about the truth of the event that happened in our society. Internet censorship made the other person’s activities on the internet hard to see. It keeps these activities secretly such as parents when they want to know their children activities on the internet. It won’t be easily to see unless they have password to access in their children’s internet activities history. As well as seen on Facebook’s decision about showing news that is nice and pleasant for people who use Facebook. To create a good feeling for everyone who use Facebook but don’t tell the truth about any events. Furthermore, Facebook decides to delete many events, example the event about user’s memory which has more than 500 persons attending. So, the users lose memory about the event that is deleted by Facebook. The next example is about “SAPPRFT bans set-top box apps”. The SAPPRFT is the China’s State Administration of press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television. SAPPRFT controls everyone’s enjoyment by banned 81 third-party applications forpeople who use set-top boxes in their home as well as try to control the internet TV industry. Many popular applications were banned by SAPPRFT because SAPPRFT want to maintain the quota and support applications owned by China Company during China’s declining cable TV industry. It means that the applications own by foreign country cannot use in China. So that people in China cannot use any application that own by foreign country, if they want.

Finally, Internet censorship has both advantages and disadvantages. For me, Internet censorship is a good thing. It gives many advantages to the internet users more than the advantages. However, the transparency and supervision of internet censorship are the most important things to have in each country to balance the benefits of both people who use internet and companies who use internet for their profits. As we seen above, If SAPPRFT allow the applications from the other countries to use in China, It can help increasing cable TV industry and people in China can also use vary applications from China company and foreign country company.

Is it necessary for China and the United States to Resolve Mutual Conflict?

China and the United States are rivals that have been trying to compete with each other to be the most civilized country in terms of economy, technology and so on. Trying to outdo one another, China and the United State have long had disputes. To my way of thinking, they are required to resolve their conflict in no time. Otherwise, it will affect other parts of the world: It’s going to make other countries decide to choose sides, there will possibly be a big war, and the world’s economy will worsen.

First, if the conflict still remains, other countries will be forced to choose the side that they are going to go for. For example, they must choose which country they will trade with or support. When decisions are made, the unchosen country will boycott those countries, so they will create more and more conflict.

Second, the remaining conflict can result in a big war like World War I and II. If they cannot negotiate in a good manner, they will have to use violence instead. For example, if China does not yield to let the United States trade with Chinese’s supporting countries, the United States might use violence to deal with the problem.

Lastly, the world’s economy will be worsening because each country cannot trade with each other so freely. When each country chooses sides, they are unable to sell or purchase goods to other countries so that the economy cannot circulate that eventually makes a country’s economy worse as well as the world’s economy.

To sum up, I think the United States and China should find ways to stop the existing conflict because it will lead to negative consequences: Other countries will be forced to choose sides, a big war can happen, and the world’s economy will be worse. All negative outcomes can be prevented, addressed or relieved if those two countries are open-minded to discuss the solution to any dispute.

Stolen Data!!!

Some 6.5 billion online accounts have already been sold or leaked on to the dark web but that is not what we are talking about. Today we are talking about how hackers sell users information in facebook or many webside by explaining the steps to get a lot of money and what to do to prevent this from happening. We believe that everyone doesn’t want someone to come with information about our privacy.

How the hacker stolen data ,I think first the hacker  look through the stolen data files for personal information like names, addresses and phone numbers, and financial information .Next the hacker will package up personal information like names, addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses and sell them costs between $1 and $450 with a media cost of $21.35.After that, hackers will look for very important information, such as information from various organizations, to get a lot of money from selling information in the dark web.

When we know that Hackers bring information and privacy, we use it for sale, so we should prevent hackers from using information,and privacy.By starting, we should always check the usage data to see the system access and use time.Next, we should look at the password that we use, whether it’s easy or not, because Hackers tend to guess simple password like 123456 or names along with birth year,so we should change the hard code. And more often, about 1 time per 3 months. Therefore, we should protect sensitive information and privacy.

But if we get hacked, what should we do? We will tell you how to get hacked.First “Change Your Password ” In case your web hacker hasn’t changed your password before you log out.Next “Report hacking” If your account is not hacking But sending ads and spam to your friends, you must report being compromised.You can also use this if you can’t access your account using a hacking attack method. We should inform web to help us.”Delete suspicious applications”often not the wicked that hacked your account. You may grant access to malicious applications that are subsequently stolen by your account, which may have to delete the information we provide to prevent hacking from these sources. Change the app’s permissions, including options such as seeing apps, accessing your personal information, can use.”Engage Damage Control” After doing everything you can to regain control over your hacked account and preventing further damage, inform your friends about what is going on.This is a precautionary step in case the hacker has been abusing your account. If you presently can’t access your account, contact your web through other social networks, by email.

Therefore, using various technologies, we should pay attention to the use, because now there are many hackers that make money by selling information and our privacy. We should prevent it when being hacked or modified to prevent hackers from exploiting and disrupting ourselves. Therefore, we should have a good decision on what to do in social media, including entering text code for security purposes. Threaten

China’s extreme opposition to the LGBT community

“LGBT stands for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people”

Since I was young, I had never heard of the LGBT community, but I had been enlightened about LGBT 2 years ago. I’ve made so many friends who are a part of this community and I want to spread the knowledge about LGBT to the younger generations, including people who don’t know what LGBT is. Currently, it’s pride month and everyone is doing their best to support and show their true selves in front of other people without being afraid of judgment. But this is a whole different situation in China. They’ve gone to the point of censoring LGBT content on social media platforms, mistreating people who wear rainbow badges or waving rainbow flags, even imprisoning novelists who have written novels about LGBT. They don’t allow their citizens to be their true selves nor learn about the world around them because of the fear and criticism that they’ve created to pressure everyone to fit what they call ”the norm ” of their society.

First of all, I would like to discuss the topic of censorship of LGBT content. During April, Weibo had been censoring posts related to anything LGBT. For example, usernames with the rainbow emoji were banned and any clothes or merchandise that had included a rainbow had suddenly disappeared from the web. These are just the first signs of their opposition against LGBT. Imagine what it would be like in a few years because censorship this year would be stricter and even same-sex marriages are illegal. An LGBT activist said, ’ If they can’t talk about these topics because it’s a sensitive issue, the public doesn’t have a chance to understand the LGBT community and would simply frown upon it which creates more discrimination and injustice for the community.’ If this continues, things will only get worse, and soon enough, everyone won’t be allowed their right of free speech. This way of living also keeps people in their own little world, causing them to have a negative view of people with different interests, while the rest of the world is slowly warming up towards LGBT. I think everyone has the right to know about the things around them instead of letting the government nitpick what they should or shouldn’t know about and keep them inside a bubble. Everyone should have the right to speak their minds without being censored or silenced.

Secondly, there’s an issue about people getting beat up because they wore rainbow badges or waved rainbow flags. An example of this would be during May in Beijing, China. There were two women who wanted to enjoy their weekend in the art zone and decided to take part of ’ International Day against Homophobia, Transphobia, and Biphobia. ’ Both women received rainbow badges from the organizer and put them on. The problem didn’t happen until the women weren’t allowed to enter the art zone by security guards, They got into a heated argument, and then one security guard suddenly punched the woman’s face repeatedly until she fell to the ground while the other woman got surrounded and kicked repeatedly by five other uniformed guards within the area. After getting some medical treatment one of the women stated that she had to get stitches in her mouth due to this incident. The security guards surprisingly weren’t charged or accused of anything because their management team said that they ”had the right to stop illegal activity and by wearing a rainbow badge it was illegal to them. In addition, homosexuals had a distorted sexual orientation so it was the only action the guards could do”. These incidents happened not because of the state or government this time, but because of an individual’s negative reaction to the rainbow flags. This clearly shows the extreme, ill-informed social attitudes about sexuality in Chinese society. I feel shocked that people would stoop down that low to shame other people just because of their sexuality or even if had the right mind to hurt others. Don’t people have any some sense of moral value?

Finally, I would like to discuss about boy’s love novelist, Tianyi, who got a longer sentence than most sexual assault cases. Boy’s love is a popular genre of novels that are mostly based on relationships between men and how they discover their sexuality. Due to writing her book, she was charged 10 years of prison for profiting from selling an ”obscene” boy’s love novel. Many people wondered and couldn’t understand how she had a heavier sentence than a case dated from 2010, in which a man imprisoned children and only got 18 months of prison. Although this has only happened to one author who wrote about boy’s love, it could soon evolve and happen to other authors of different genres in the future, so no one is safe if the government finds what you’ve written has sensitive content. I personally believe that everyone should write what they’re passionate about or else they’ll lose interest in writing entirely, or start to feel unmotivated to write. I also think it’s unfair that she got a longer sentence than a kidnapper since, once he gets out, he could do more harm to others, while she only writes books to entertain herself and people with the same interests.

In conclusion, by censoring LGBT online, people can’t learn about the events that are around them and this makes them remain ignorant. this also could affect their future relationships because they might offend many people when they talk negatively about LGBT. Their negative opinion about LGBT could also turn into hatred, and if they don’t have any moral values, they could possibly harm others like in the example I stated earlier. Finally, I discussed how China had imprisoned a novelist for writing a book about boy’s love and how it’s unfair that a child kidnapper got a shorter sentence than her. In addition, I also mentioned that it restricts writers from writing what they’re passionate about, and if it isn’t stopped, then it could possibly spread out and effect writers of other genres. My personal opinion on this subject is that China wants to keep their citizens from knowing about the LGBT community and deem this community as a danger to their current government system, so they try hard to shut down any LGBT groups in China, creating strict laws like “no same-sex marriages” or to ban anything LGBT related on TV and social media. I hope that in the future China would start to lessen these rules and behavior so that their citizens could express themselves more freely.

If you don’t agree with the blog or have different opinions please be free to comment them down below since I would love to hear your view on this topic.

 

Author’s note

I would like to credit some articles and blogs that I’ve used when I was making this blog.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/it-can-be-dangerous-to-wave-a-rainbow-lgbt-flag-in-china

LGBT Activism in Mainland China

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/nov/20/chinese-writer-tianyi-sentenced-to-decade-in-prison-for-gay-erotic-novel

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/11/19/china/chinese-erotic-fiction-writer-prison-intl/index.html?no-st=1560951616

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-lgbt-un/china-urged-to-take-action-on-lgbt-rights-after-backing-u-n-changes-idUSKCN1QO1MU

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_China

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/04/17/tech/weibo-china-censorship-lgbt-intl/index.html

 

 

 

 

America Banned Huawei

On 3 January 2019, a report suggest that President Trump may use an executive order to ban Huawei and ZTE purchases. When I saw the news, I was so curious, why would he do that? This was the beginning of a trade war between America and China.

Firstly, I agree for banning Huawei because even if Huawei is cooperating to trade items and minerals to use for making hardware with other businesses. Much like how Apple has Chinese employees from Huawei in their company or working in the technology department. It’s not just Apple that’s cooperating with Huawei, there are other businesses who cooperate with Huawei too, for example: Google. I think they’re cooperating in servicing websites like google play but they’re still competing against each other. In May 2019 they had planned for a 5G rollout in other countries. Although some countries were afraid that they would use this chance to steal their important information, for example: Australia and Japan.

Every business have their own goals that they want to succeed including Huawei too. They said that their goal is to make their achievements higher than Samsung and Apple.This makes me realize that Huawei is finding a way to do that by cooperating between business. In my opinion, trading is like when you hide a knife behind your back then become friends with others that also hide a knife behind their backs. So this means that each person has to be careful not to lose their benefit to each other.

Google was thinking of banning Huawei because of Trump’s order to put Huawei in the blacklist so that means that all the businesses in America, even America’s allies in Europe need to stop cooperating with Huawei. But I don’t agree with this because if they cooperate together to make new technologies in the future, it cans make good relationships between each other and not cause a war. If they start to have problems, they would have to make an agreement for fixing problems in each country.

My opinion about this is neutral. If Trump bans Huawei, they will be able to make their own products better by themselves in the future without other companies which already banned them. It has a chance to cause a war between the US and China in future. But if Trump doesn’t ban Huawei then this will make America’s telecommunication companies like Apple’s profit will go down and Huawei’s profits will be higher instead. Is Trump’s decision right or wrong? The answer depends on your opinion.

Which is the first thing that you need ? LAPTOP or TABLET?

” Between a “Laptop and Tablet” which is the “first” thing that you really need it? ”

I really recommend you to buy a laptop first. It’s the first thing to buy, I think it’s important to making a decision and these two thing are the product that most people use in their working life.

I want to show some function between Tablet and Laptop.

Tablets have become quite popular, because they are easy to use. In many ways, the best of tablet can ‘almost‘ replace laptop. It can go with you anywhere and anytime because the size and the weight that’s under two pounds. Tablets also have a long battery life with big storage. But the software of tablets can do just the basic tasks that laptop can do. The problem is the ‘lack’ of the input devices and hardware performance limitations like some features need to dropped to fit in the tablet, so a price will be under (average about) $100. If you want to buy a tablet in a lowest price, it’s almost sell in an online shop.

Laptops size start at 12-16 inch, the weight isn’t much different than tablets in 2019. The price is more than $100. Basically laptops have more functions, especially a fully contained system use for writing or working hard. CPU also good with a plug for USB cable and this is usually used for the most of business works. The software can surely run faster than tablets. Microsoft is allowing laptop to have a full function or advanced features. And this is a reason why the price and the weight is higher than tablets.

Although, a laptop isn’t much comfortable to traveling but it’s also have a laptop with foldable display it’s easy to work and play anywhere as a 2-in-1 laptop and tablet in 1 product, about this product it’s actually come with a high price ,so this is an another choice to make a decision when you really want laptop and tablet in one product. If you are saving money and not sure what’s the product that you really need first, a laptop is your answer. It’s more expensive than a tablet but if you buy a tablet first it will not have the full functionality or contained system to use, you will be upset with it later.

it’s not much comfort for traveling but it will feel comfortable about the full function and contained system.

papapaiprana

To make a decision about what’s the first thing to buy, In my opinion I want you to buy a laptop first for sure, it’s not much uncomfortable for traveling but it will feel comfortable about fully function and contained system to use like play safely not taking much risk. This is just the first thing so you can buy a tablet later because a company will make a new generation of device every year.

Is it true that Wikipedia is unreliable?

I believe that more than 90 percent of people will use Google as a tool to get the information that they need. Nowadays, many students can access the internet and use it as a gadget to learn and explore the world. And searching for information to answer their question, their curiosity, or even for their homework, they will target Wikipedia as their way out. Wikipedia is quite popular in terms of a website that gather lots of information in one place. Unfortunately, the information is not accurate since everyone can edit the information that shows on Wikipedia. Therefore myself as one of the users that use Wikipedia for my research as well, I encounter the difficulty and hard time to analyze the information as well. I will not use only Wikipedia as a source for my research. I will find two or three more sources to compare and weight the most accurate and credibility before I will use that information for my homework.

Anyone can edit the information in Wikipedia although people who edit it will provide non-true information. For example, I can click the “Edit this Page” tap in Wikipedia and change information however I choose. So I decided that Thailand has never had a coup, I can make it so, regardless of whether or not it is false. Wikipedia may have a summary of an article, information or book on your list. Sometime, the editor who did that summary might have made a mistake or they might miss the main content. It is even possible that an editor who is biased against it may add personal opinion.

Most educational institutions do not allow students to use information from Wikipedia to refer to projects or essays. For example, in 2007 student from a college in the English department said: “I use Wikipedia all the time for my research but I certainly would not cite it.” This showed us that Wikipedia is unreliable. I have been looking for an error in the content of Wikipedia. I had found that Wikipedia itself said: “Wikipedia was unreliable source because Wikipedia cannot monitor thousands of edits made every day, some of those edits could contain vandalism or could be simply wrong and left unnoticed for days, weeks, months, or even years.” This Quote shows that Wikipedia comes out to accept itself that Wikipedia cannot check the data that has changed at any time throughout the day. Therefore, it is common for many schools to have a policy to prevent students from referencing information from Wikipedia.

Most of Thai people have found something that they want to know from Wikipedia. For example, if Thai children want to find the answer for their homework or to find more knowledge, they will find on Wikipedia. But they get a low score because information from Wikipedia not all correct. I’m one of them. When I was 10 years old, I searched the information about the dam to write an article. I did not check before sending it to the teacher because I was confident that the information from Wikipedia is completely reliable. When the day that the teacher told score I got 2.5 out of 5, I was shocked about why I had a few points. I had to ask the teacher. The teacher answered that my articles are very confusing. I still don’t believe my teacher then I took my article to my friend and gave it to him to try to read. When my friend had finished, he told me that this article was very confusing. So, I went back to check the information in Wikipedia that I used by comparing the data from Wikipedia to various websites. I have found that the information from Wikipedia does not match other websites, while other websites have similar information. Since then I tried not to use more information from Wikipedia.

Finally, we cannot believe everything on Wikipedia because as we know, Wikipedia is open for anyone to write and share their perception which is subjective and this reason makes many schools have a policy not to use data from Wikipedia for reference projects. There are also examples of Thai students using Wikipedia data and get a low score. So, we should consider the information carefully before believing.

Twitter Censorship

Censorship of twitter is the word that use to describe the company censoring accounts or content on their platform, which is Twitter. Twitter censorship also includes governmental notice and take down request to Twitter. Which Twitter use it in accordance with it Terms of Service. When the government or authority a valid removal request to same content on Twitter (such as tweet) that is violate a Terms of Service or laws, that content will be delete from Twitter.

First, i saw the news about “Government Blocking of Twitter”, it is talking about the government and some authority decided to block internet access to Twitter or its content. in 2019, the government of some country such as China, Iran and North Korea have blocked internet access to Twitter in their countries. Egypt, Turkey and United Kingdom have blocked internet access to Twitter to, but it was just a temporary block in 2011.

The censorship of twitter was base on government request. The government helps Twitter and others companies to censor contents on their internet platform and remove some illegal contents that have been posted there. If illegal content have been found on Twitter, the social network site will notify users from that, that they may not seen it. Government officials, the companies themselves or other outside parties will take care about censoring contents (in this case it is tweet) that may be illegal. In India, there was an account spoofing the Prime Minister of India named “PM0India”. And that account was block from Twitter in August 2012. In 2016, an American blogger called Richard Silverstain was comment about criminal investigation which is involved a minor and according to Israeli law. So that causing him to blocked from Israeli IP addresses, following request by Israel’s Ministry of Justice.

In the Twitter’s Terms of Service it said ” Twitter require its users to agree to, Twitter retains the right to temporality or permanently suspend users’ accounts based on violation of the agreement”. There is an example took place on December 18, 2017, when Twitter banned the accounts that belonging to Paul Golding, Jayda Fransen, Britain First and the Treditionalist Worker Party. 2 years after that, Twitter released the “quality filter” that can limit users’ visibility. Users can choose what they want to see something about that content or not. But then Twitter found that this feature had a software bug that needed to be fixed in future, they found it because Alex Thomson, a writer for VICE (a private company). He said that many prominent Republican politicians had been “shadow banned” by the filter.

Finally, Censorship of Twitter is good. It can detect the conyent that is violance, illegal or accordance its Terms of Service.